1328064049438 1328064049438 3
8searchN Szh s Nastysexualchicks y
Szh sesearchrsearchh Nastysexualchicks 1 Nastysexualchicks 2 Nastysexualchicks 06 Nastysexualchicks 0 Gdiscover 9search3search search search32 Szh 0ztod40 Gdiscover 9search3search ztod
c Szh ssearch6
0search9 Gdiscover 3 Gdiscover asearch1 Szh 2 1328064049438 06 Szh 0 Szh 9search3 Szh japanese%20fucking Nastysexualchicks 38 1328064049438 6 Nastysexualchicks 04 Gdiscover 43
searchmmsearchnmake%20fuck%20%CD%BC Gdiscover u Szh c
io Gdiscover
Reference has already been made to the
effect of vitamin E on chick health and
immune function, while other vitamins
have been researched none show the
same degree of effect as vitamin E.
Table 4 summarises work investigating
the effect of different vitamins fed to
breeders and consequent impact on
progeny health.
Recent work by Rebel et al (2004)
investigated the effects of several elevated
levels of vitamins and trace elements
fed to breeders and broilers on the
immune system of birds infected with
malabsorption syndrome.
Broilers derived from breeders fed elevated
vitamins and mineral levels had
increased numbers of leukocytes at day
old which indicated stimulation of the
immune system (see Table 5).
Fig. 1. The effect of protein-to-energy ratio in the breeder feed on chick weight at hatch (Spratt and Leeson 1987). |
Calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, magnesium and chloride are involved in shell formation hence general improvements in shell quality lead to better egg and chick quality. Variations in maternal phosphorus supply have been shown to influence bone ash of young but not older progeny. Broiler performance was not affected by these treatments so the practical significance of this work is not clear but the use of relatively low phosphorus levels in breeder diets, while benefiting egg shell quality, may not lead to the best possible bone integrity in the early stages of growth.
Most interest in this field has centred on
the use of chelated minerals which have
been shown to increase deposition in the
egg and transfer to the tissues of the hen
and the embryo.
Most recent work has focused on the
antioxidant status of breeders, embryos,
offspring and the role of selenium.
Surai (2000) has shown the role of
Selenomethionine on both vitamin E and
glutathione peroxidase levels in eggs,
embryos and chicks up to 10 days of
age.
The economic benefits of using
Selenomethionine compared with
sodium selenite have been examined in
a number of unpublished field trials in
the UK. Hatchability improvements
ranged between 0.5-2.0 chicks per 100
eggs and in another trial 0.3-0.7 chicks
per 100 fertile eggs. Few of these tests
involve a proper assessment of subsequent
broiler performance although
comments about chick quality are generally
positive.
In one of the commercial trials mentioned
an improvement of 0.5% in mortality
and cull rate at 10 days was
observed when organic selenium
replaced sodium selenite.
Research has indicated that the
improvements in chick immunity as a
result of mineral fortification of hen diets
may result in improved liveability.
Flinchum et al. (1989) demonstrated
that leghorn breeders fed supplemental
zinc methionine to a zinc adequate diet
had progeny with improved survival to
an E. coli challenge. Similar improvements
to progeny liveability were seen
with breeders fed supplemental zinc and
manganese amino acid complexes.
Table 6 is a summary of those minerals
which, when fed to breeders, have an
effect on progeny performance.
There is clear evidence that a high protein
to energy ratio depresses hatchability,
and probably chick performance.
The experiment by Whitehead et al.
(1985) shows the effect of excess protein
where the higher protein level reduced
reproductive performance, producing
3.1 fewer chicks per 100 fertile eggs.
Chick quality was also reduced so that
the difference in saleable chicks was 4.0
per 100 fertile eggs.
The effect of energy protein ratio in the
breeder feed is shown in Fig. 1. This
emphasises both the effects of excess
and inadequate protein, and also indicates
that the optimum level is quite
steeply defined.
According to this trial the optimum
protein level is at 5.52g protein per
100kcal which converts to an optimum
of 15.18% protein for a diet containing
2,750cal/kg of feed.
The protein level of the diet and its
ratio to energy is important not only for
parent performance but also for chick
quality.
| Table 7. Commercial comparison of breeder feeds based on wheat or maize (400g/kg). | |
| Advantage of maize over wheat based feed | |
| Mortality during lay (%) | -1.7 |
| Total eggs (per hen housed) | +3.8 |
| Hatching eggs (per hen housed) | +4.8 |
| Hatching/total eggs (%) | +0.9 |
| Hatch of set eggs (%) | +0.6 |
| Hatch of fertile eggs (%) | +1.1 |
| Second quality chicks | -0.1 |
| Based on a comparison of two commercial houses each containing 6500 female grandparent breeders. Data to 58 weeks (Ross Breeders, unpublished data, 1998). |
There is evidence of improved breeder
performance when maize is compared to
wheat as the main cereal in breeder
feeds. From a survey of many depleted
commercial flocks overall hatch of fertile
eggs in the UK based on wheat diets and
Brazil based on maize diets is 83.3 and
86.2 per 100 eggs respectively.
Other management factors may contribute
to this difference in hatchability
other than cereal source; male management
is very good in Brazil and the
resulting high fertility may also contribute
something to this difference.
Unpublished commercial development
trials from the Netherlands and Aviagen
Ltd grandparent flocks (see Table 7) support
this observation.
The most likely benefit of maize is
probably in shell quality and thickness.
From the same data average poorer
shells with specific gravity of <1.08
accounted for 26.1% of eggs from wheat
fed hens and 17.1% from maize fed.
Studies of hatching losses showed less
late dead embryos (>18 days) and less
bacterial contamination. These two
responses are expected with eggs of better
shell quality.
Evidence about fat levels and sources is
conflicting but there is no question that
this is an important consideration. Added
fat levels should be kept low in breeder
feed (1-3%) and preference given to
unsaturated vegetable oils rather than
saturated animal fats. Work from
Mississippi State University compared
maize oil and poultry fat and generally
supported the use of more unsaturated
fat (see Table 8).
Maize oil increased 21 day bodyweight
over that of poultry fat and improved
slaughter weight of broilers in comparison
to equal levels of poultry fat and
lard.
| Table 8. Experiments comparing fat sources and/or levels for broiler breeders. | |
| Reference | Fats compared |
| Brake (1990) | PF |
| Brake et al. (1989) | PF |
| Denbow & Hulet (1995) | SBO, PF, FO |
| Peebles et al. (1999a, b) | CO, PF, LA |
| Peebles et al. (2000a) | PF, CO, LA |
| Peebles et al. (2000b) | PF, CO, LA |
| Fats: PF ??“ poultry fat; SBO ??“ soybean oil; FO ??“ fish oil; CO ??“ corn oil; LA ??“ lard |
Over and undersupply of nutrients into
and through lay can have a very significant
impact on breeder production and
quality of progeny. This places greater
emphasis on the nutritionist providing
the correct nutrient density diet and the
flock manager to provide appropriate
feed allocation in lay.
Addition of micronutrients to the
breeder has been shown to be beneficial
to progeny quality especially in the early
production period. Use of specific
dietary ingredients such as maize can
affect breeder performance and progeny
quality. Both on economic grounds and
on biological grounds, high quality nutrition
of breeders is well justified.
Source: Aviagen - June 2005